Posts tagged ‘film’

February 21, 2013

Tropfest Review: Great Day [SPOILERS]

Tropfest, the worlds largest short film festival, has long been one of my favourite events of the year. This year I bring you a review of all 16 finalist films. If you reside in Australia, you can view all the films on the Sydney Morning Herald website, or watch the all the proceedings via SBS On Demand. Outside of Australia you can view the films on the Tropfest Youtube channel.



Great Day is allegedly the true retelling of a ‘little mans’ perfect day, which comes to a climax as he dishes out some ‘justice’ unto some homophobic hooligans.

The tale is framed by the man telling the story over a beer at a bar, which seems appropriate since the experience feels like an awkward coworker, who doesn’t quite understand what makes an anecdote interesting, rambling about their weekend at Friday night drinks. He talks us through a reenactment of his day in a light conversation way, providing a voice for the other characters in the story.

Don’t get me wrong, I actually quite liked the technique. The actor was just cute and interesting enough to pull off the way it was told, at it was a nice way to inject some unique stylisation into an otherwise relatively bland short film. Although in some moments he did go on a bit (you got an awesome milkshake – we get it!).

One technique that confused and frustrated me (perhaps because I missed some apparent Clockwork Orange references I’m told were present) was the “dramatisation’ of the moment he threw his milkshake at the bullies. Isn’t the whole film a ‘dramatisation’ of the story? They chose to do this part of the scene in a studio, in front of some curtains instead of on the street where the rest of the scene takes place. The only reason I could think of is so that the BMW the ruffians were driving didn’t get covered in milkshake (which is a total cop out).

But the main reason that this film simply missed for me is the suggestion that he achieved some kind of ‘justice’ by throwing a milkshake at some bullies. Firstly, he’s not convincingly the ‘little man’. He says that the story is a win for the guy who gets ‘shit on all the time’, but there is no evidence that he is treated badly day-to-day. He makes enough dough to live out of home, parties with friends on weekends, takes home pretty girls and is likeable enough to be buddies with the local corner-store owner. He’s exactly the kind of cute, ‘awkward’, nerdy guy that is totally chic at the moment.

Secondly, it seems the filmmakers were trying to achieve a message about homophobia but there is no real lesson to be seen. He throws a milkshake in some thugs faces and then runs away. He doesn’t even offer some witty quip to point out the wickedness of their ways – it’s just aggression in response to provocation (which is probably what the hoodlums wanted). The bullies are depicted far too lame and stupid for anyone to admit recognising themselves in them, and the chances of those thugs (or any bullies watching) taking a hard look at themselves and deciding that they should change their ways and their prejudices is very unlikely. It’s more plausible that the incident would have provoked them, and finding the storyteller gone, they’d seek out other weedy nerdling to take their aggression out on.

While most of the film has a nice cutesy styling to it and the lead character is likeable and interesting the conclusion of the film fell completely flat for me. I give it 2/5 stars.

February 7, 2013

Sky-High Hopes for ‘Cloud Atlas’ Come Crashing Down

'Cloud Atlas' banner

Despite the star-studded cast and big budget I’d heard almost nothing about the Cloud Atlas before sitting down to watch it. I knew it was based on book, but otherwise I knew nothing. With a name like that, I was actually expecting something along the lines of Water for Elephants (perhaps I had it confused with Charlie St Cloud?), with pretty scenery but mostly just another romance flick.

I was pleasantly surprised to find that this film ambitiously tackles six stories, each set in a different decade (spanning from the 1800s through to a post-apocalyptic future) with unique characters, and each in a slightly different style. It worked surprisingly well and for the most part all the stories were engaging and entertaining (with the Neo-Korean future perhaps the most compelling, and the tale of an arrogant young composer at the turn of the 20th century slightly dull and pointless). They managed to swap between stories without a jarring feeling, and the pacing was great with a good balance of action, suspense, comedy and drama. It was shaping up to be a really compelling, multilayered film with all the shades from bumbling British comedy, through murder mystery and period drama, to sci-fi action-thriller. By mid-film I began to wonder if the book could be intriguing enough to break my dreaded book-reading draught. As it built to a climax, I was very excited to see how these stories would tie together in the end…

But they didn’t. In the end each of the stories just kind of rounded off, without any real connection. Hints at the other stories are dropped occasionally; the 21st century publisher reading a manuscript based on the 1970s murder mystery, the music of the 1930’s composer playing at a future fast food restaurant, etc. But these seemed token and have no more bearing on the consecutive stories any than The Beatles or Wuthering Heights have had on my life (which is basically none). There was a flimsy attempt to imply a deeper moral about history repeating itself, and the actions of each individual having consequences throughout history, but there just wasn’t enough of a tangible link between the stories for this to really resonate for me.

Another common critique of the film is the way the actors play different roles in each of the stories, and some viewers may find that the fairly obvious prosthetics ruin the immersion. I didn’t find this to be the case and I was able to enjoy the film despite the make-up jobs. Except for one; South Korean actress Doona Bae looks nothing short of alien made up as a red-haired 1800s socialite.

Donna Bae in 'Cloud Atlas'

I kept my eye out for a link between the various roles each of the actors played in the story line, but couldn’t find one. This didn’t bother me all that much, but if the intention was to imply that the characters were related, or perhaps the same ‘souls’ repeating the same mistakes, this was lost on me. All of the actors did a good job portraying their various characters, and they were just that – varied. They didn’t seem to have any similar personality traits, and didn’t play the same roles in each of the stories as far as I could tell.

Each of the individual stories are well done, however, putting them into the same film just sets the audience up for disappointment. It set up high hopes, and then completely botched the landing. Still it was an entertaining enough film and I’ll give it 3 out of 5 stars.

%d bloggers like this: